IPC::Open2 - open a process for both reading and writing using open2()
use IPC::Open2; my $pid = open2(my $chld_out, my $chld_in, 'some', 'cmd', 'and', 'args'); # or passing the command through the shell my $pid = open2(my $chld_out, my $chld_in, 'some cmd and args'); # read from parent STDIN and write to already open handle open my $outfile, '>', 'outfile.txt' or die "open failed: $!"; my $pid = open2($outfile, '<&STDIN', 'some', 'cmd', 'and', 'args'); # read from already open handle and write to parent STDOUT open my $infile, '<', 'infile.txt' or die "open failed: $!"; my $pid = open2('>&STDOUT', $infile, 'some', 'cmd', 'and', 'args'); # reap zombie and retrieve exit status waitpid( $pid, 0 ); my $child_exit_status = $? >> 8;
The open2() function runs the given command and connects $chld_out for reading and $chld_in for writing. It's what you think should work when you try
my $pid = open(my $fh, "|cmd args|");
The $chld_in filehandle will have autoflush turned on.
If $chld_out is a string (that is, a bareword filehandle rather than a glob or a reference) and it begins with
>&, then the child will send output directly to that file handle. If $chld_in is a string that begins with
<&, then $chld_in will be closed in the parent, and the child will read from it directly. In both cases, there will be a dup(2) instead of a pipe(2) made.
If either reader or writer is the empty string or undefined, this will be replaced by an autogenerated filehandle. If so, you must pass a valid lvalue in the parameter slot so it can be overwritten in the caller, or an exception will be raised.
open2() returns the process ID of the child process. It doesn't return on failure: it just raises an exception matching
exec failures in the child are not detected. You'll have to trap SIGPIPE yourself.
open2() does not wait for and reap the child process after it exits. Except for short programs where it's acceptable to let the operating system take care of this, you need to do this yourself. This is normally as simple as calling
waitpid $pid, 0 when you're done with the process. Failing to do this can result in an accumulation of defunct or "zombie" processes. See "waitpid" in perlfunc for more information.
This whole affair is quite dangerous, as you may block forever. It assumes it's going to talk to something like bc(1), both writing to it and reading from it. This is presumably safe because you "know" that commands like bc(1) will read a line at a time and output a line at a time. Programs like sort(1) that read their entire input stream first, however, are quite apt to cause deadlock.
The big problem with this approach is that if you don't have control over source code being run in the child process, you can't control what it does with pipe buffering. Thus you can't just open a pipe to
cat -v and continually read and write a line from it.
The order of arguments differs from that of open3().
See IPC::Open3 for an alternative that handles STDERR as well. This function is really just a wrapper around open3().