Does a fork(2) system call to create a new process running the same program at the same point. It returns the child pid to the parent process,
0 to the child process, or
undef if the fork is unsuccessful. File descriptors (and sometimes locks on those descriptors) are shared, while everything else is copied. On most systems supporting fork(2), great care has gone into making it extremely efficient (for example, using copy-on-write technology on data pages), making it the dominant paradigm for multitasking over the last few decades.
Perl attempts to flush all files opened for output before forking the child process, but this may not be supported on some platforms (see perlport). To be safe, you may need to set
$AUTOFLUSH in English) or call the
autoflush method of
IO::Handle on any open handles to avoid duplicate output.
fork without ever waiting on your children, you will accumulate zombies. On some systems, you can avoid this by setting
"IGNORE". See also perlipc for more examples of forking and reaping moribund children.
Note that if your forked child inherits system file descriptors like STDIN and STDOUT that are actually connected by a pipe or socket, even if you exit, then the remote server (such as, say, a CGI script or a backgrounded job launched from a remote shell) won't think you're done. You should reopen those to /dev/null if it's any issue.
On some platforms such as Windows, where the fork(2) system call is not available, Perl can be built to emulate
fork in the Perl interpreter. The emulation is designed, at the level of the Perl program, to be as compatible as possible with the "Unix" fork(2). However it has limitations that have to be considered in code intended to be portable. See perlfork for more details.
Portability issues: "fork" in perlport.